|
|
Posted by Steve on 09/27/07 15:50
"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:n1PKi.9164$JD.442@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:P9adnZd_bcfuMWbbnZ2dnUVZ_uWlnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>
>>> I wasn't aware that HTML/CSS was a Microsoft-only technology.
>>
>> It isn't. But what MS calls a browser is a piece of crap (at least
>
> I've got about 100 million of my closest friends that say otherwise.
> They work in churches, military bases, goverment offices and other whore
> houses throughout the world.
>
> Watchoo gots, champ?
100 million...is that like the 'zillion' girfriends?
just because people are pragmatic with their money setting up windows
desktops that are very touchy-feely, and have a propensity toward
standardization of software, it does NOT mean that those under the
*direction* of their employ LIKE or in anyway AFFIRM the quality of the
browser to which you say those numbers attest. your being prone to
exaggeration coupled with your illogical conclusions.
fallacy of conclusion.
"organic things are good for you, so uranium must be good for you"
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|