|
|
Posted by Steve on 09/27/07 23:01
"gosha bine" <stereofrog@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fdegdl$mf$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> Mads Lee Jensen wrote:
>> Hello..
>> Was wondering shouldn't an abstract static method cause a E_STRICT ?
>>
>> this is my test.
>>
>> error_reporting(E_STRICT);
>> abstract class Test_Abstract
>> {
>> protected abstract static function testStatic();
>> }
>>
>> class Child extends Test_Abstract
>> {
>> protected static function testStatic()
>> {
>> echo 'what';
>> }
>> }
>> $test = new Child();
>>
>> or how should i read this
>>
>> "Due to an oversight, PHP 5.0.x and 5.1.x allowed abstract static
>> functions in classes. As of PHP 5.2.x, only interfaces can have them."
>>
>> http://php.oregonstate.edu/manual/en/migration52.incompatible.php
>>
>> im running 5.2.2
>>
>
> Hmm... this has to work (i.e. raise an error) - there is a check in ZE
> code, there is a test in tests/ and actually it does work on my self
> compiled php, but not on the precomp 5.2.3 binary. Weird.
>
> However, I think disabling abstract statics was a rather stupid action
why is that?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|