|
|
Posted by Shelly on 09/30/07 13:56
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:v9udnTXx0NRPOGLbnZ2dnUVZ_o2vnZ2d@comcast.com...
> howa wrote:
>>>> And please don't top post. Thanks.
>> On 9 30 , 2 42 , Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>> howa wrote:
>>>>>> you 'll have problems if you call the function twice.
>>>> On 9 29 , 9 10 , Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>> howa wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> I have a function, e.g.
>>>>>> function foo() {
>>>>>> include("bar.php");
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> and the bar.php contain contents e.g.
>>>>>> $global_v1 = "abc";
>>>>>> $global_v2 = "def";
>>>>>> I want to execute function foo(), but at the same time, let the
>>>>>> variables declared in bar.php to have global scopem is it possible?
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> You should not have an include within a function call. Among other
>>>>> things, you 'll have problems if you call the function twice.
>>>>> Actually, globals are bad things to use, anyway.
>>>>> --
>>>>> ==================
>>>>> Remove the "x" from my email address
>>>>> Jerry Stuckle
>>>>> JDS Computer Training Corp.
>>>>> jstuck...@attglobal.net
>>>>> ==================
>>> >
>>> > this can be solved by using include_once.
>>> >
>>> > the reason of using function call to include is we want to
>>> selectively
>>> > include the needed files, prevent include useless files (i.e. factory
>>> > method?)
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> (Top posting fixed)
>>>
>>> It isn't that much overhead to include an extra file or two. But if you
>>> do that a lot, perhaps you should examine your methods.
>>>
>>> And please don't top post. Thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ==================
>>> Remove the "x" from my email address
>>> Jerry Stuckle
>>> JDS Computer Training Corp.
>>> jstuck...@attglobal.net
>>> ==================
>>
>>
> >
> > I am posting via Google Group, I am no control.
> >
> >
> >
>
> (Top posting fixed - again).
>
> Here's a clue. There's a key on the right side of your keyboard. It has
> a little arrow pointing down.
>
> When you go to reply, you press that key until your cursor is at the end
> of the message. Then you start posting your reply.
>
> Other google groupers have figured that out. Why can't you?
>
> A. Because they're either stoopid or just plain lazy.
> Q. Why do they continue doing it?
> A. People who refuse to post properly.
> Q. Who are the most annoying people on the internet?
> A. Because it upsets the normal flow of conversation.
> Q. Why is it so bad?
> A. Top posting.
> Q. What is the most annoying thing on usenet?
Jerry, as you know, I don't normally top post or botton post. I "in-line"
post. However,
(a) It is definitely NOT the most annoying thing on the internet and
(b) There are times when a top post is appropriate, such as a one-line thank
you, etc. It saves the reader from having to scroll down to find the new
message.
There are exceptions to all blanket statements -- including this one :-)
Shelly
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|