|
|
Posted by Relayer on 10/02/07 16:49
On Oct 2, 8:59?am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-sicur...@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
> On Oct 2, 9:58 pm, Relayer <relayer...@aol.com> wrote:> On Oct 1, 8:40?pm, rem6...@yahoo.com (Robert Maas, seehttp://tinyurl.com/uh3t)
> > wrote:
>
> > > Their Web site for applying for employment is inaccessible to
> > > low-income disabled people who are most in need of jobs.
> > > Is there any lawyer in the audience who will help me sue them?
>
> > You can also apply at the store itself. I know this because there is a
> > TRU down the street and they have one of those street side signs
> > asking people to apply on-line or in the store.
>
> > In addition, why would YOU sue them? You are HERE..on line..so YOU
> > HAVE ACCESS to a computer...and instead of spamming a news group,
> > perhaps you should have spent the time APPLYING for the job
>
> Hmmmm, I think you will find your caps key is useless for those of us
> who don't use a monitor, (I think you might also not have a clue of
> what the OP is talking about).
> Well regarding the access issue anyway. While it is true to say that
> he / she might have access to a computer, they are most likeley
> accessing the web and other items with some kind of alternative
> device, such as a Screen Reader or Magnification program. Google them,
> you'll get a lot of hits on both.
> I use a ScreenReader myself, a long with Windows Magnifier.
> --
> Regards Chad.http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz
And that would prevent you from applying for a job on the internet in
which way? You were able to access the post and thi snews group,
therefore you are able to access the directions on how to apply.
Lot's of assumptions here on him using a screen reader or whatever.
And if he had to use a screen reader, it is unlikely he would be hired
for a job working retail, as the ability to see is pretty fundemental
to the position. If he cann't see, it would be like a guy in a
wheelcahir crying discrimmination because the Chicago Cubs wont place
him on the team.
Sorry.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|