|
|
Posted by DrFeelgoodWA on 10/03/07 17:04
"Jim" <jim@home.con> wrote in message
news:kQPMi.172$R95.112@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...
> "Travis Newbury" <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1191429553.952048.5090@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>> On Oct 3, 11:33 am, Harlan Messinger
>> <hmessinger.removet...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> Now it's evident that you are ignorant of the law. They are
>>> obligated to
>>> hire him judging him under the same criteria as they would apply
>>> to
>>> anyone else as long as he can do the job with reasonable
>>> accommodation.
>>
>> So, I have a restaurant and need a hostess. A woman, with years of
>> experience, the best qualified of all the applicants applies for
>> the
>> job. The problem is she recently had her face burned in a fire and
>> is
>> horribly disfigured...
>>
>> Can she sue me because I did not hire her?
>
> Yup.
>
>
> Discrimination because she
>> is "handicaped" because of her disfigured face?
>
> Yup.
>
> Do I want some
>> disfigured woman to be the first thing my customers see when they
>> walk
>> into my restaurant?
>>
>> Hell no.
>>
> Then sell the restaurant. Get a modeling agency. Duh.
What if slug ugly decides she wants to be a model?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|