|
|
Posted by Relayer on 10/03/07 20:13
On Oct 3, 11:56?am, "Jim" <j...@home.con> wrote:
> "Travis Newbury" <TravisNewb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1191429553.952048.5090@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 3, 11:33 am, Harlan Messinger
> > <hmessinger.removet...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> Now it's evident that you are ignorant of the law. They are obligated to
> >> hire him judging him under the same criteria as they would apply to
> >> anyone else as long as he can do the job with reasonable accommodation.
>
> > So, I have a restaurant and need a hostess. A woman, with years of
> > experience, the best qualified of all the applicants applies for the
> > job. The problem is she recently had her face burned in a fire and is
> > horribly disfigured...
>
> > Can she sue me because I did not hire her?
>
> Yup.
>
> Discrimination because she
>
> > is "handicaped" because of her disfigured face?
>
> Yup.
>
> Do I want some> disfigured woman to be the first thing my customers see when they walk
> > into my restaurant?
>
> > Hell no.
>
> Then sell the restaurant. Get a modeling agency. Duh.
Ok..so by that logic, a mdeling agency can be sued for not hiring the
disfigured woman? And if so, why not? Can Hooters be sued by a woman
with very small breast? If not, why?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|