|
|
Posted by dorayme on 10/06/07 22:44
In article <1191685585.333485.3580@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 6:27 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > In article <6443e$47066d6e$40cba7be$6...@NAXS.COM>,
> > "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:
> > > Again, we keep hearing about these wonderful, accessible, low-bandwidth
> > > flash sites but no examples... Sounds like a Unicorn hunt.
> >
> > I do recall someone (I think it might have been Bergamot) putting
> > a similar and very reasonable question to old Travis a while
> > back. Travis disappeared for a while, it was the most silent I
> > have ever heard him be. I think he might have hurried to a
> > holiday destination the furthest from any computer likely to have
> > a connection to a ng.
> >
> > --
> > dorayme
>
> Provided an example yesterday look for it in this thread.
I did notice a huge hunk of impressive looking code from you soon
after I posted. This is a "wonderful, accessible, low-bandwidth
flash site"?
Seriously, I am sure it is something; but an example of a site
site it is not.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|