Posted by Karl Groves on 10/07/07 13:48

dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in
news:doraymeRidThis-41B1C5.08574907102007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au:

> In article
> <1191688677.951356.316570@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 5, 6:29 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> > In article
>> > <1191605468.768652.27...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
>> > Travis Newbury <TravisNewb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Oct 5, 9:31 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > ??? When, where? The statement may be true for those
>> > > > over-bloated image-slice sites or MS Publisher abortions, but
>> > > > no graphics is going to undercut text for bandwidth.
>> >
>> > > And we all know how much fun an all text website can be...
>> >
>> > Do we?
>> >
>> > --
>> > dorayme
>>
>> I do
>
> Here is a little "website", I made an index especially for you
> Travis, use your back button between reads and tell me honestly
> if you did not absolutely split your sides for minutes on end:
>
> http://dorayme.150m.com/jokes/jokesIndex.html
>

I know I laughed uncontrollably at the popups that came up on *every* page.

--
Karl Groves
http://www.WebAccessStrategies.com

• Next in forum: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news
• Prev in forum: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news
• Thread view: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news

[Reply to this message]