|
|
Posted by SpaceGirl on 10/08/07 12:12
On Oct 8, 10:26 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-
sicur...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Oct 8, 6:02 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:> Phil Payne wrote:
> > >> It is not really about processor speed (unless your using an old 486)
> > >> but connection speed. Yours was broadband. My point is not everyone
> > >> 'has|can have|will have in the near future' access to broadband.
>
> > > But even on broadband - 30 seconds?
>
> > > Most users have MUCH shorter fuses and would long since have clicked
> > > away.
>
> > Ohhhh! I see your point. Sorry dialup-mindset. Sometimes I *wish* a page
> > loaded in 30 seconds!
>
> http://www.mortgagenews2.com
> It's from the same company that SpaceGirl gave the previous example
> from. It's a shocker though, I mean it should have been done in HTML +
> CSS for style + PHP / some other server side language for the user
> account stuff.
Why should it have? Because you don't like Flash?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|