|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 10/09/07 17:12
Travis Newbury wrote:
> On Oct 9, 9:09 am, Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-sicur...@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
> > True. I can gather from reading his posts that he has got no
> > experience developing real world systems that people need to actually
> > use:
>
> Yea, Cartoon network, CNN, Turner, Disney, ABC Sports, GA Tech,
> Siemens, AT&T, Chick-fil-a, Snoop Dog, Aerosmith, Rockapella, and
> Atlanta Sports Council. (Can you tell I am based out of Atlanta?) Each
> of these sites use Flash content (mostly flash video and video
> manipulation) I created. (Read back, this is what I specialize in) I
> believe these are considered real world systems that people use every
> day.
>
I think with these examples where getting back to designing depending
on the target market again, some sites can use it and get away with
it.
> > Anyone with three quarters of a brain and who studies current
> > trends of how web surfing habits are going, would realise that people
> > are blocking things like Flash and JS more and more due to anoying and
> > offten moronic things that designers like to use them for!.
>
> Why yes, that is the trend we are seeing... (There was some sarcasm in
> there)
>
Hmm, actually I think as more people download IE 7 that might not be
the case as it does not have as many of the cicurity issues.
> > Until Addobie begin complying with DDA regulations in a number of
> > countries you can forget about useing Flash as a viable method of
> > delivering web content for the majority of websites!.
> > I am not talking about accessibility just in regards to blind people
> > by the way, I am talking about the general useability of Flash itself.
>
> Chaddy you and jerry are pretty much ignorant when it comes to Flash
> aren't you?
Well actually, I am aware that Flash has accessibility features built-
in, but for simple sites such as the one before in this thread it more
benofficial from a DDA pov to just use plain old HTML and CSS.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|