|
|
Posted by danielcarrington4 on 10/09/07 16:01
On Oct 3, 9:19 am, Onideus Mad Hatter <use...@backwater-
productions.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:02:50 -0500, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> >>>Not at all. I don't need a web site.
> >> *pats you on the head*
>
> >> That's very cute, child. Hear that everyone? He doesn't NEED a Web
> >> site. *nods*
> >look ev<COCK SLAP>
>
> Is your nameJerry? No? Then why the fuck are you replying for him?
> What are you two lover-bitches sharing a group brain now or what?
> Time to giveJerryhis half of the brain back, Stevie.
>
> >>>The training we do is all corporate - Fortune 500, mainly. Our
> >>>customers know us. And they know how to contact us.
> >> Right, it's magic, they phone up Miss Cleo and she connects the new
> >> clients with you via the mystic ether of idiocy.
> >hell, if you had *ANY* cu<COCK SLAP>
>
> Let me know when you manage to even GET a web site, then maybe your
> "opinion" about mine will be worth more than shit smeared onto a
> toilet bowl, you poser class wannabe.
>
> >>>We have more work than we can handle now, and have to turn some down.
> >> So much work in fact thatJerrybarely even has time to make any posts
> >> on Usenet!
>
> >> ...wait. Uh, plot hole, look out!
>
> No comment on that, eh Sparkles?
>
> >>>For that we sub work out to other companies
> >> I think you mean "out sourcing", Dumbass. Yeesh, this stupid ass
> >> retard can't even lie without sounding like a dumbfuck!
> >oh no, sub work is in conjuntion with, not the out sourcing of. now had you
> >a job (walmart barely counts), you'd know the difference.
>
> Free cl00, kiddie, unless you're a teacher there's no such thing as
> "sub work". Keep trying to not sound like a retard though, it's kinda
> cute...in a pathetic sort of way.
"Sub" is usually short for "Subcontract" - it's a term used especially
in military and government sectors - although many private firms use
the "lingo" too.
He used the word correctly.
HTH!
Dan
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|