Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 10/10/07 02:08

Travis Newbury wrote:
> On Oct 9, 9:02 pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net> wrote:
>>> No, it isn't. But does that mean that we should be regulated on where
>>> and how we use it?
>> The gods wont strike your down if your make an all flash site where html
>> would be more appropriate, but your may pay a price...
>
> Why is it always an "all flash" site? I do not think you can find a
> flash lover in this group that says an all flash site is a good thing,
> present company included
>

It was Spacey that was making such assertions.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

• Next in forum: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news
• Prev in forum: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news
• Thread view: Re: It does not look good for Target. Web Accessibility news

[Reply to this message]