Posted by Erland Sommarskog on 07/23/05 00:06

jsfromynr (jatinder.singh@clovertechnologies.com) writes:
> Sorry If my description was not able to make the point / approach
> clear. I am using a single table for a given month to hold that month's
> changes/transactions

As I said, that is a design that leads to problem, unless you unite
the tables in a partitioned view.

> Erland I wish to ask you ;can I mail you my queries

I prefer if you keep it to the newsgroups. Then other people can assist.
And, as Damien testified, other people can also benefit from the
exchange.

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/books.asp

• Next in forum: Ann: Intellisense for Query Analyzer (the real deal)
• Prev in forum: Re: Update queries using more than one table
• Thread view: Re: I wish to Avoid ...

[Reply to this message]