|
|
Posted by danielcarrington4 on 10/13/07 17:20
On Oct 12, 9:24 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> "Drew" <whoisthatmasked...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4710047c$0$4996$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>
>
> > Steve wrote:
> >> "Drew" <whoisthatmasked...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:470ff10d$0$20614$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> >>> Damn, Steve. Put your religious beliefs aside and read the metaphor.
>
> >> my lack of religious beliefs aside, what then, was the metaphor i missed?
> >> i thought i showed i understood the metaphore and drew the contrasts at
> >> the same time. sup?
>
> > Who's neck is the noose around?
>
> > Who is the recipient of masterfully laid snares?
>
> > What heathen is raging?
>
> > What "murderer" has fallen into his own creation?
>
> the 'heathen' of course. that would technically be the godless or
> irreligious. and though really the comment was aimed at all participating in
> the current thread, i pay particular attention to religious babble and
> actually fit the definition. so, aside from condecending to the entire list
> of participants for our 'raging' - which the religious tend to like to do,
> condecend that the rest of us just don't 'get it' and their morals are far
> superlative to other mortals' - i think the analogy is full of logical holes
> and is merely drivel. now if the kook wants to defend his position, i invite
> it.
>
> > Pay attention.
>
> yes, please do. why you're jumping in to say i missed the point, when i
> clearly got it, is beyond me.
You're taking it too literally. Think metaphorically.
Think back to the days when you read "Canterbury Tales" in school and
you'll get it. :)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|