|
|
Posted by dorayme on 10/18/07 20:13
In article <Xns99CD350B61C01nanopandaneredbojias@85.214.62.108>,
Neredbojias <monstersquasher@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 06:46:09 GMT
> dorayme scribed:
>
> > In article <Xns99CCE5D0BDAB0nanopandaneredbojias@85.214.62.108>,
> > Neredbojias <monstersquasher@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> how did you deduce this? Seems a bit of a non-sequitir from here.
> >
> > Would you know a deduction from an induction from a reduction
> > from an abduction?
>
> Between the 2 of us, who would you say has a better grasp of the English
> language? I'm not pointing this out just to "rub it in", although as a
> woman you should be used to coming in second.
Yeah, well, as a schoolboy, I am going to corner you today near
that old Elm tree and make you drink frog soup which I made in Mr
Castle's 4a science class Wed avo prac session. You won't be so
brazen then...
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|