|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 10/19/07 14:08
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:06:38
GMT Tim Streater scribed:
>> I will stop now. Tim, it irritates me too to keep seeing the word
>> "frames" in the same sentence as "evil" or "dead". I prefer
>> sunnier associations. I kinda like:
....
> If people said "You should use xyz instead of frames, and here's why,
> and here's an example using xyz that functions identically to this
> example using frames, and here's why its better" then sceptics like me
> might pay more attention.
But if people always said what you wanted them to say, you'd have no excuse
to opt out from better methods of engineering your page...
Here's an example of a non-frames page with a stationary header and footer:
http://www.neredbojias.com/_a/whelan1.html
The nav happens to be in the header, but it could be anywhere. This page
works in ie6, ie7, firefox, and opera - all the browsers I am currently
able to test. No, the markup isn't exactly a "piece of cake", but neither
is it so esoteric as to be improbably conformed. The point is don't be so
lazy and you may be surprised by what you can do.
--
Neredbojias
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|