|
|
Posted by Robert Baer on 10/20/07 06:55
Rob Waaijenberg wrote:
> Robert Baer schreef:
>
>> How can i fix this to get rid of the W3C complaint, but still have
>> control of that font size (line 61 in code having 77 lines)?
>> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
>> <!-- does NOT validate; bitches on use of size=6 and face="Arial"
>> together -->
>
>
> [snipped html code]
>
> Didn't I ask you just a couple of days ago to provide links to online
> pages instead of posting html-code.
> And didn't I explain that it helps us helping you?
> Because when we visit the online page we get to see the same things you
> see?
>
> Now you complain about W3C "bitching on use of size=6 and face="Arial"
> > together".
> But that is not what the complaint is at all. Because in writing your
> post you misrepresented the actual W3C-statement.
>
> The actual complaint is
> "The mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in which
> you've placed it; the other mentioned elements are the only ones that
> are both allowed there and can contain the element mentioned. This might
> mean that you need a containing element, or possibly that you've
> forgotten to close a previous element.
>
> One possible cause for this message is that you have attempted to put a
> block-level element (such as "<p>" or "<table>") inside an inline
> element (such as "<a>", "<span>", or "<font>")."
>
>
> The validator is trying to guess what you did. And in doing that, come
> up with suggestions.
>
>
> There are a couple of things you did wrong:
> - you've got a <tr></tr> without any cells
> and
> - you forgot to use a <p>-paragraph in the cell (that you don't have)
> - You used <font ....> wihtout having an element that it applies to.
>
>
To post this stuff would mean i must use a website, which i ain't got.
I do not understand any of the items you mentioned, because i do not
understand how this stuff works.
How does one find a "coder" that can do this stuff without a month
(or so) delay from input to output?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|