|
|
Posted by Sanders Kaufman on 10/22/07 04:04
"Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:ffgovi$3uv$5@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:54:50 -0500, "Sanders Kaufman"
>>That's a fine way to retalliate AFTER an attack - but a lousy way to
>>prevent
>>one.
>>
> Oh and hiding the door behind a bush in hopes they don't find it and
> then leaving it unlocked isn't lousy? Please.
That kind of simple-mindedness is where you go wrong on this issue.
You dumb it down to a lock on a door, or hiding behind a bush.
You also ignore the fact that ALL security measures must work with a system.
Once you corret those two mistakes, you'll better see that obscurity through
security is a valid security technique.
That's why they don't publish the travel schedules for nuqulure submarines.
I find it quite comical that I'm having to lecture right wingers (OF ALL
PEOPLE!!!) about the value of keeping secrets in order to protect stuff.
Do *all* of your beliefs and lifestyle choices contradict each other so
dramatically?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|