|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/21/07 23:22
Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>
>> Michael Fesser wrote:
>>> Which spammer cares about where he's posting his crap to or if it's
>>> "appreciated" there? Which spammer really checks guestbooks or forums
>>> they are going to spam? They just fire up their scripts and that's it.
>>> Trying to talk to them is just ridiculous and a waste of time. I really
>>> have better things to do.
>> You obviously don't know. But if you don't like the way the way I
>> respond to them, then I suggest you ignore my responses.
>
> No. In some cases you simply have to respond even to people like you,
> because other inexperienced people might take your comments seriously.
>
ROFLMAO! No, you don't have to respond to anything.
>>> That just proves your ignorance. Maybe you should read some articles
>>> about Usenet and what really makes a troll. And while you're at it,
>>> reading something about netiquette might be of interest as well, because
>>> obviously you still don't know anything about it.
>> Not at all. I have, and it's describing your actions here perfectly.
>
> I would _really_ like to know how you define a Usenet troll, apart from
> just a "You don't agree with me, so you're a troll".
>
Try a google search.
>>> If I want I could prove my identity quite easily. But you've already
>>> shown multiple times that even when prompted with the naked truth you
>>> ignore the facts and stick with your wrong and narrow-minded opinion.
>> Quite frankly, I don't give a damn what your identity is. But you have
>> yet to come up with any "facts".
>
> I (and others too) have posted facts often enough, but since they didn't
> fit your own opinion or came from "incredible" sources you've rejected
> them all. Like I already said.
>
Your "facts" are only facts in your own mind. But you obviously don't
know the difference between facts and opinions.
Let's see you prove some of your "facts". If they are facts, you should
have no problem.
>> But you have a lot of "opinions" you
>> think are universal truths.
>
> You're talking about yourself here.
>
Nope, just you.
>>> Definitely not, but a conversation with a brick wall is more fun than
>>> discussing anything with you, which in fact is not a discussion at all,
>>> if one side denies all points of the other and starts calling names.
>> Why? Just because you jump into a conversation
>
> Welcome to Usenet.
>
Thanks, but I don't need a welcome from a troll.
>> and start telling me
>> what I shouldn't be doing? Forget it - this is not your newsgroup.
>
> Neither yours. With responses to spammers you're just an annoyance to
> many regular readers. I'm not the only one who asked you to please stop
> feeding the spammers. But you don't listen to any of us.
>
So, ignore me. Spammers are annoying me. And so are you. That's what
I'm going to do with you - like I do other trolls.
>> And
>> if I want to tell spammers to go away, I will.
>>
>> And yes, it does help keep spam down.
>
> I'm sure that you can prove that ...
> Or maybe this is just your own opinion taken as a universal truth?
>
Look at newsgroups which monitor spam vs. those which don't.
alt.computer.consultants is a great example.
>> But obviously you've never been
>> in a newsgroup which has been taken over by spammers.
>
> I prefer news servers with competent admins, where spam is kept low even
> without any self-appointed "spam fighters".
>
And any new sever admin who doesn't agree with your policies is
"incompetent"? ROFLMAO. Why don't you just run your own news server.
Then you can set any policies you want.
>> Go away, troll.
>
> Is this your newsgroup or what? What about putting me in your killfile?
> Or do I have to show you how it works?
>
You couldn't show a rock how to roll down hill. Troll.
> Micha
>
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|