|
|
Posted by dorayme on 10/29/07 21:53
In article <Xns99D88D250FF15nanopandaneredbojias@85.214.62.108>,
Neredbojias <monstersquasher@yahoo.com> wrote:
> dorayme:
>
> >> And lastly, I'm not one of those who subscribe to the "least
> >> common denominator approach" to web page creation just to strictly
> >> satisfy certain concepts which are arguable to begin with.
> >
> > Presumably "just to satisfy certain concepts" indicates you think
> > it a dumb trivial clerical obsessive motive. Otherwise why use
> > these words?
> >
>
> An author _should_ try to make his pages as accessible as possible, but
> sacrificing popular and versatile utility for coverage of uncommon
> conditions and situations is just plain dumb.
A good author does not have to "sacrifice" fancy things to
"cover" the less common type of users, (especially the disabled,
the ones on very slow dialup etc etc). It may be hard work for
sure, but it is not a case of sacrificing, at least not anything
but authoring time.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|