|
Posted by Steve on 10/30/07 04:18
"Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.t0y4bkqz5bnjuv@metallium.lan...
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:04:46 +0100, Steve <no.one@example.com> wrote:
> complexity is !== security. simplicity most assuredly *is*.
>Hmmm, that's nonsense offcourse. Simplicity makes it easier to secure
>things and spot possible threads. Simplicity itself offers no security
>whatsoever.
ok...so i should have used == instead of ===
;^)
consider the substitution:
simplicity > complexity
and this trend:
simplicity->complexity
security--
for the reasons you state above...spotting threats.
>I agree that a KISS method surely is the way to go however.
fully.
>Bloated 'I can do everything'-classes are only usefull for those ill
>equipped to write a method of their own or maybe stretched for time.
exactly.
cheers
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|