|
|
Posted by Secret Agent X on 11/03/07 17:23
Chaddy2222 <spamlovermailbox-sicurity@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>mic...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
>> > This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
>> > websites.
>> > Separate layout from content.
>> >
>> > There's no reason to use tables any more.
>> > Everything can be done with CSS.
>> > Tables are so 2002ish ...
>> >
>> > Do you agree with that?
>> > I don't.
>> > I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
>> > desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
>> > But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
>>
>> Tables are the easiest
>> If you need something simple use tables
>That's not true. CSS is simple and more powerfull then layout tables.
Rubbish!
Two columns, two rows, resizeable, cross browser compataible:
<table>
<tr>
<td> Cell one</td>
<td> Cell two</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> Cell three</td>
<td> Cell four</td>
</tr>
</table>
That's simplicity. It's also felxible.
CSS layout is a nightmare. Unreliable, not only because it's suggested
and not required, but also because it varies between browsers and runs
into problems with resizing.
X
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|