|
|
Posted by Travis Newbury on 11/06/07 20:14
On Nov 6, 2:24 pm, mbstevens <NOXwebmast...@xmbstevensx.com> wrote:
> > Wrong, Travis.
> > The correct sentence is:
> > "Flash is completely accessible to modern readers, as long as they
> > have the Shockwave Flash plugin istalled"
> ...and as long as the _version_ of the plugin is what is required.
> I have Fox with Flash on Ubuntu. Plays a lot of stuff fine, but
> chokes on movies at, for instance, the Onion.
Well you have a few choices;
Download the newest plugin (or wait until the make it, then download
it).
Switch to a real operating system (yes that was factitious).
Write a letter to the sites that don't work, complain, and hope there
are enough visitors with your problem that complain so they change.
or, move on to a different website (that will teach them to fool with
the likes of you...).
The way I look at it is this. If you choose not to see content for
what ever reason then too bad for you. You made your choice. If you
can's see it because it is either not accessible or the pluguin isn't
available or your internet connection is too slow, or any other reason
beyond your control, then well, it sucks to be you. But why should I
have to suffer and not see it just because you can't?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|