|
|
Posted by Bone Ur on 11/06/07 21:53
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:35:57
GMT Chaddy2222 scribed:
>> >> Maybe so.
>> >> But I doubt it can rightly be defined as accessible content.
>> > Neather is audio for a particular part of the disability community,
>> > but the deff don't need descriptions of live audio content.
>> > The slide show is visual.
>> > You can't really be done any other way.
>>
>> Eh? If an image "should be" accessible content, why should a
>> sequence of images not be? Furthermore, I made a great slideshow in
>> javascript, which, of course, is not perfectly accessible, either.
>>
> Well they could be, but the portfolio is a purely presssontational
> thing.
> BTW it also saves on HTTP requests as the images are all in the SWF
> file.
Yeah, that's true. And, btw, I don't hate Flash (anymore) but I do think
it could still be better (-in addition to the shlocks screwing-up their
code.) Probably in time it will be.
--
Bone Ur
Cavemen have formidable pheromones.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|