|
|
Posted by Rik Wasmus on 11/06/07 20:28
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:44:22 +0100, Sanders Kaufman <bucky@kaufman.net> =
=
wrote:
> "Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:op.t1duk1ik5bnjuv@metallium.lan...
>
> <http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=3D1&uri=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fsimpler-=
solutions.net%2Fpmachinefree%2Fthinkagain%2Fthinkagain.php?
>
> Validate, fix, then check again (and an issue is probably best address=
ed
> in alt.html). You're making it needlessly hard for yourself using XHTM=
L
> instead of HTML though.
Hmm, quoting gone wrong?
> What?!
> But for *very* few differences - they're the same thing.
> What about using XHTML makes this harder?
Validating to true XHTML (i.e. CDATA in script/style etc., starting with=
=
<?xml ?>). Now, XHTML intended and served as tagsoup HTML, that's not so=
=
much harder, no.
-- =
Rik Wasmus
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|