|
|
Posted by Steve on 11/09/07 02:46
"Darko" <darko.maksimovic@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194571229.350686.153590@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 8, 11:20 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:jeydnSVWVuqcFa7anZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> > Steve wrote:
>> >> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>
>> > <crap>
>>
>> crap? i directly explained how you are not getting what my point was, and
>> how the debate you are wanting is not germain to my original point. how
>> is
>> that crap?
>>
>> > You aren't even reading what I'm saying.
>>
>> really? you are talking about how my style of formatting sql is poor. i,
>> and
>> the rest of us, are talking about the fact that formatting should be
>> applied
>> to sql. i think that shows at least *one* of us has been paying
>> attention.
>>
>> > And you should see who started the insults.
>>
>> really? make a bet with you. go to the earliest thread that you can and
>> quote the insult i flung at you. i'll do the same. the one who has the
>> earliest date stamp wins, ok?
>>
>> let's get started...
>>
>> Message-ID: <8YCdndIBAbkzsq7anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com>
>>
>> jerry: "Don't be an asshole again, Steve"
>> jerry: "Yep, programmers with any sense don't do it that way."
>> jerry: "I said the way you did it is stupid."
>> jerry: "But like anyone with no argument, you keep
>> trying to put words into my mouth."
>>
>> wow, i almost quoted the ENTIRE response dated: 2007-11-08 11:47 AM !!!
>>
>> ok, now it's your turn. :)
>>
>> > Sorry, Steve. You're not going to get any rise out of me for your
>> > crap.
>>
>> again, crap? please explain.
>>
>> > This is my last post to you on the subject.
>>
>> probably because i gave you direct points for you to address and you
>> can't
>> seem to or won't. a proper EOT is when one is either proven wrong, agree
>> to
>> disagree, or cannot seem to establish the topic being had. i still don't
>> think you realize that it is the latter in this case.
>>
>> at least support your *evidence* that I STARTED the insults to you.
>> that's
>> just an out-and-out L.I.E.. the last post i made did get stern, but
>> certainly didn't contain ad-hom's...just restrained frustration.
>
> You should both know, based on your seemingly vast work experience,
> the general
> rule of aggresive argument - no one started it first, everyone was
> just provoked.
> (for it sounds good, I must remark it isn't really some official rule,
> but something
> I made out in the moment :)
>
> What's worse (or better), everyone thinks they're right, so usually no
> lies are
> included (except maybe for tiny ones ;)
lol. probably very true.
well, someone usually claims the other guy started it...i happen to be the
other guy and am simply challenging jerry to show that his claim was
correct. in this case, either he forgot or is creating a lie that i don't
feel is tiny enough to ignore. :)
i also don't mind being wrong. i've been there and will be again.
criticized? don't mind that either. jerry and i seem to go back and forth
sometimes because he tends to tangent from the point i am trying make. i
should learn by now, since i can never get him to come to topic or ever
directly counter. and, he usually ends the conversation just as he did here.
i get the impression that he skips most of people's posted content the more
of it there is or the harder he finds it to counter. while most of the time
he's right on a lot of things, you can not get him to think that either he
is wrong or hasn't understood he's arguing against things that were never
points of contention in the first place.
oh well.
later.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|