|
|
Posted by Michael G on 11/15/08 11:22
"Andy Hassall" <andy@andyh.co.uk> wrote in message
news:jvbde11ijfrgk5rmjkp5mb9d6k2evg1n80@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:43:36 -0600, "Michael G" <mike-g@montana.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>> function create($className) {
>>>> return new $className;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if it's a better solution though.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's not a bad idea. It would eliminate the need for an array of
>>> strings.
>>
>>Just a note, some languages would not allow that. That makes me a bit
>>uncomfortable. They would require an explicit open/closed paran at a
>>minimum.
>
> But you're not writing in other languages, you're writing in PHP where
> it's
> valid syntax, so where's the problem?
>
Between my ears!!
Just because the php interpreter doesn't barf doesn't necessarliy mean that
it is defined behavior. I have ran across this before with different
implementations of compilers, undefined behavior that is.
Thanks, Mike
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|