|
|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 11/28/07 11:51
Mika wrote:
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>> Mika wrote:
>>> We know, we could rewrite the entire site from scratch, however when
>>> you balance the cost and time of that with supporting a browser
>>> which 1% of the people *arriving* at our site have,
>>
>> which is probably the most standards-compliant browser available.
>> It's the only one to pass the Acid2 test. (But I believe I've
>> already mentioned this.)
>
> Zzz yes you did... if you think regular web surfers know or care...
> :P
Probably not, but _you_ should.
>> What, no Opera? Next, we'll find a note on the page that says, "Sorry,
>> Jamaicans can't shop here." <snorkle>
>
> No, then I'd be racist like some people here.
<snorkle> is like <guffaw> or <chuckle>.
>> Oh, and your iframe does work for me with Opera 9.23.
>
> You're on the wrong street. Oxford Street does not load properly on Opera,
> does it?
Oh, I didn't realize you had different templates for different streets.
We've been looking at George Street for so long ...
[checks Oxford] The street starts with a London bus with a Harrod's ad
on the side of it, then horizontally scrolls down the street if I wish
to do so. I don't see any difference from George.
>>> and they all have IE installed anyway
>>
>> Only those using Windows...
>
> Hahah you guys are hilarious! If they don't have Windows, then they have
> Safari installed, which the site is also written for!
My Linux distro did not come with Safari installed.
> What the heck are you going on about? :-S ;)
You said, "they all have IE installed anyway"
...for some value of "all", I suppose.
--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|