|
|
Posted by Blinky the Shark on 11/30/07 23:25
Els wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>
>>> Ed Mullen wrote:
>>>> john smith wrote:
>>>>> sorry I apolagise for what i said before itturends it was only becuse
>>>>> the the way mycoppysof fier and fox and see monky were set up to act
>>>>> is why it worked for me so i was totly rong so igess thereisno way
>>>>> inless of corse likemethepersonhas fier fox set to openwindows
>>>>> instedof tabs
>>>>
>>>> There is no way. Period. No "inless", no unless, no nothing, it cannot
>>>> be done. Period!
>>>
>>> Great one Ed! I was having a tough time deciding whether this was some
>>> form of bad "cyber-speak", non-English struggle, or illiteracy going on
>>> here...
>>
>> I'm still trying to untie "itturends".
>
> I'm betting "it turns out", with a 'silent d' added in, and the word
> 'out' missing.
AND a spare "e" thrown in just for good measure?
--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project - http://improve-usenet.org
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|