|
|
Posted by Steve on 01/02/08 18:54
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Z6qdnRHvoubZNefanZ2dnUVZ_sKqnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> "i said for *PHP* the behavior is essentially the same."
>>>
>>> "i never said php had pointers"
>>>
>>> You're so dense you can't even see the contradiction on your own
>>> statements.
>>
>> *behavior*...context clue, dumbass.
>>
>
> You're so dense you can't even see the contradiction in your own
> statement, stoopid troll.
no, it's just amusing that you can't read what's being said rather than what
you'd like to see.
> And if you're talking behavior, you've just shown you have no idea about
> how to use pointer.
you're referring to c-style language pointers. again, fuckwit, i'm talking
about an easy way to describe to & references in *php* to someone who
doesn't have any experience with the construct. 'pointing' seems to get the
point across faster that other descriptives...even though it is not
technically accurate - a point i was *obvious* in making *before* using the
terminology. look up the term 'caveat'. that's the exact word i used in
preface of the description.
illiterate twit.
> You've just once again opened your "mouth" and removed all doubt about
> your stoopidity.
a cliche you just mangled...and have no idea who originated it - outside of
google.
>>> You're just a stoopid troll, Stevie, who uses people in a desperate
>>> attempt to get some kind of acceptance. You don't use your real name
>>> here because you're so afraid people will find out you're not really a
>>> programmer.
>>
>> is that right.
>>
>
> Yep. You give yourself away virtually every time you respond to a post
> here.
you're funny.
>>> But you're stoopidity has given you away once again. Any programmer
>>> with more than two weeks of *real experience* in C++ programming knows
>>> the difference between pointers and references - and knows how wrong you
>>> are.
>>
>> php != c++ ... your point is moot.
>>
>
> Then why did you bring it up? Backpedaling again, stoopid troll?
i didn't. micha did initially. secondarily, you did. my first mention was
the *caveat* that the *behavioral* description was not literally correct
with c-style languages.
>>> You're the worst kind of loser.
>>
>> is that anything like a dipshit who keeps posting the same drivel day
>> after day just to have someone to chat with? sounds more like you jerry
>> than me.
>
> Just the truth, Stevie. But you can't handle it. You could always stop
> responding. But I know you won't.
again, jerry, for me to be effected emotionally by your insults, i'd have to
care about your opinion. i don't. you can stop trolling now...it has no
effect.
further, you still respond because *you're* a troll.
> Now I hear your mommy calling. Better go see what she wants.
lol. she did call. having christmas together with the rest of the fam. are
you trying to say you've found out my age. i think your only safe assumption
there is that i am younger than you. that's a *safe* assumption simply for
the fact that i know your *exact* age...and MOST EVERYONE here is younger
than you. :)
cheers, pops.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|