|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 01/06/08 14:36
Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:00:21 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:14:24 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-baiter@no.where>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:26:11 -0500, Gary L. Burnore
>>>>>> <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-baiter@no.where>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In <XrqdnW_lGbgurODanZ2dnUVZ_u_inZ2d@comcast.com> on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs <nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Right. Try again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
>>>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
>>>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>>>> My bad - didn't look first at the group list. While perfectly
>>>>>> acceptable in AWW, in a comp group you're right in that its off
>>>>>> charter which *is* enforcable. Perhaps the zealots in AWW should
>>>>>> attempt to have it reclassified into a group that has an official
>>>>>> charter, but in the meantime nobody cares :o)
>>>>> There's really no such thing as a valid charter in an alt.* group.
>>>>> Alt.config is a bogus group of morons who want to turn alt into
>>>>> another form of big8 groups. Never gonna happen. Of course,
>>>>> moderated groups can and do control content but non-moderated groups
>>>>> are freeform. Stukkie will just have to learn to use a killfile
>>>>> there.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nevertheless, please accept my apologies for the mistake.
>>>>> Accepted. Unfortunately, Jerry won't stop crossposting back to
>>>>> comp.*.
>>>> Sorry, Gary.
>>> Liar.
>>>
>> Let's see you prove that statement, Gary.
>
> You're doing it for me, Jerry. YOU are still posting to comp.lang.php
> and he's not "making you do it". YOU are the one posting off charter.
> YOU. Not him.
>
And your posts are on topic? ROFLMAO! Pot-Kettle-Black.
>> you're just as bad as the troll is.
>
>>>> I have been attacked and maligned by two trolls in a.w.w
>>>> who have cross-posted to c.l.p. and other newsgroups. I will not let
>>>> those go away.
>>> Because you're owned. Owned owned owned.
>>>
>> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud. See if you
>> like it?
>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>
Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running? ROFLMAO!
>> But you're obviously a troll - familiar over a bunch of newsgroups and
>> message boards on the usenet. A quick search brings up several
>> complaints about your trolling.
>
> Poor little tard. You should surely soon be quoting that Jerry
> Terranson website and stepping right into kookdom. Once you find it,
> you'll see why I feel safe in saying that people who make up false
> shit about you don't matter. YOU're the one who's making a fool of
> yourself.
>
A lot more than just one website, troll.
>
>> So from now on I'll just ignore you - like the ignorant should be.
>>
>>>> However, it may not be a problem from at least one of these for much longer.
>>> If he loses an account because you lied to his NSP, I'll see to it he
>>> gets a free account. Since you've decided to go play NetKKKop, I'll
>>> take every one of your off charter posts to your provider, comcast. K?
>>>
>>>
>> No lies. Just showing the ISP's what they've done.
>
> Liar.
>
Sorry, troll. No lies.
>> And fine - post all you want to comcast. It doesn't bother me, because I
>> don't spam.
>
> You post off charter. You're doing it right now. Prove otherwise.
>
And your post is on charter? ROFLMAO!
Pot-Kettle-Black.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|