|
|
Posted by dorayme on 01/23/08 20:15
In article <NmJlj.285285$iM4.194787@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi>,
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> Scripsit Zone:
>
> > "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote in message
> > news:1jFlj.285172$8v3.64083@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> ...
> >> --
> >> Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
> >> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
>
> A comprehensive quote, down to a sig, is the usual sign of lack of
> comprehensive reading. Please keep using that style as long as you
> remain clueless. Using XHTML in web authoring isn't a _sure_ sign of
> cluelessness, you know, though often a useful hint.
>
> > Can anyone explain where are the code in
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd
> > that tells input tag can be outside of form tag but it must be e.g.
> > inside div tag.
>
> Is that a serious question? It looks like one, but other symptoms
> suggest the opposite,
>
> Anyway, here are some crucial declarations from it:
>
> <!ENTITY % block
> "p | %heading; | div | %lists; | %blocktext; | fieldset | table">
>
> <!ENTITY % Block "(%block; | form | %misc;)*">
>
> <!ELEMENT body %Block;>
>
> Now, how can you have an <input> element inside the body? Hint: check
> the definition of %misc to see that there's nothing there that allows
> <input>. Then work out the declarations for the block-level elements
> like <p> and <div> to see that <input> is allowed there
It's such a damn shame or a sight to behold (I rather fancy the
latter, there being too many damn shames in this world already)
that you can be so informative (the point about the %misc being
something that perhaps only you and 4 others on the planet would
have spotted *quickly*) yet give all this personally insulting
preamble babble.
How is it that something like me from a quite different planet
can see that the OP is quite sincere and serious and you can't?
Perhaps you need to get out of Iceland more often. Perhaps Bobby
Fisher's late presence has had an unsettling effect deep down for
years?
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|