|
|
Posted by NC on 01/24/08 20:21
On Jan 19, 2:43 am, alexander.pet...@abv.bg wrote:
>
> Recently I published a new PHP MVC Framework.
It would be great if you could explain why you think your framework is
better than what's already out there. So far, the only selling point
I can see is that it's more understandable to ASP.Net types, but are
there enough of those among PHP developers to justify the exercise?
As to the supposed "elegance" of Java and C# and "bizzare" (your
spelling) nature of Perl, this is largely a matter of opinion. One
only needs to try to retrieve a remote Web page (which in .Net
requires half-page of code spawning three objects) to wonder where the
bizarre truly lies...
> Any opinions on it are welcomed.
Applications written with your framework won't scale beyond a single
DB server, because your code as written is unaware of the possibility
of DB server replication. Your TApplication class has only one Db
property, while scalable applications need two DB server connections;
reading can be done from any server in a replicated setup, while all
writing must be done by the master server. Granted, the vast majority
of applications out there will never scale beyond a single DB server,
but you wanted an opinion, so heree it is... :)
Cheers,
NC
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|