|
|
Posted by Mimic on 12/11/16 11:24
dave hillstrom wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:15:16 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>
>
>>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:38:24 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>Like you need a survey to figure that out... ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Not when he's pulling figures out of his ass anyway. *sigh* I wish
>>>>>the lurkers supported ME in email, I REALLY do...*snicker*...
>>>>>
>>>>>*Hatter hums to himself*
>>>>>http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/bw3/
>>>>>
>>>>>^_^
>>>
>>>
>>>>Looking better, you know what would make that look nice.. extend the
>>>>width to 100%, so you get a "widescreen" effect.
>>>
>>>
>>>An interesting idea, I'll test it out, see if I like it. Did you try
>>>moving your mouse on the frog?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Didnt the first time, but thats really cool :D
>>
>>
>>
>>>Search engines supposedly won't pick them up...but then that's
>>>bullshit. Check this out:
>>>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Hatter+blog
>>>
>>>o_O
>>>
>>>Searching for Hatter and blog puts mine right up at number one and ALL
>>>the content is graphic. This is because search engines don't
>>>generally care about the actual content on your site so much as how
>>>many people are linking to you. If you click on the "cached" option
>>>in Google you can see this:
>>>"These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: hatter blog"
>>>
>>>So really, if your sites are bad ass enough, you don't need to do
>>>anything to get them "search engine optimized" or what the fuck ever
>>>scams faux web designers (like a lot of the ones around here) fall
>>>into.
>>>
>>>I figure, if no one in these froups can formulate a halfway coherent
>>>reason that I can't counter for not using Flash...I'm just gonna go
>>>ahead and do the whole thing like that.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>Onideus Mad Hatter
>>
>>
>>Theres alot to SEO, and it is worth getting into. Generally its
>>considered bad SEO to do everything, particularly key aspects, in flash
>>only, same goes for images. But, google for one, have been experimenting
>>and progressing, with the indexing the textual parts of flash and images.
>>
>>The reason your site comes top would be much more to do with usenet
>>posts being cross fed into web boards, which then get google crawled. I
>>did an experiment once, something todo with doom3 [i forget]. I knew
>>there would be alot of traffic and discussion on boards for it as it was
>>just released, so I made a number of posts on the top usenet doom3
>>froups with my link in, and sure enough, these fed the webboards, which
>>now had higher traffic and higher result positions, which then increased
>>the PR of my site and lifted that up. Increased my traffic by about 400% :D
>>
>>The main SEO point where people fall down, is the whole keywords. If you
>>over pack the meta keywords or just stack keywords into the whitespace
>>of your sites [- google is big on content relevance, and thus keywords
>>in content], you can actually get banned from engines. - Again I
>>experimented with this, got off google in like 2 days :P The best thing
>>to do is use semantically correlated keywords - words that mean the same
>>thing, so you dont repeat, and used appropriately of course.
>>
>>What you could do, with the whole widescreen idea, is horizontally
>>repeat the background at 100% width, then center your content and layer
>>it over the top :)
>>
>>These may also be of use if youre going for the whole flash thing:
>>http://tinyurl.com/7pmmu
>
>
> mimic, werent you being mean and nasty just a day or two ago?
Possibly, Im logical, so if some cluetard was spouting shit and I put
them in their place, then yuh, I probably was mean and nasty ;)
--
Mimic
"The man who awaits the rising of the sun, cannot wait forever."
ZGF0YWZsZXhAY2FubmFiaXNtYWlsLmNvbQ== [ www.hidemyemail.net ]
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|