|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 11/27/09 11:24
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:15:19 -0700, Fly Cooter
<fly_cooter_@example.com> wrote:
>In article <8jo9g15n20kh1ol9n7bdbbc48709ia5crh@4ax.com>,
>usenet@backwater-productions.net says...
>>
>>
>>So really, if your sites are bad ass enough, you don't need to do
>>anything to get them "search engine optimized" or what the fuck ever
>>scams faux web designers (like a lot of the ones around here) fall
>>into.
>>
>>I figure, if no one in these froups can formulate a halfway coherent
>>reason that I can't counter for not using Flash...I'm just gonna go
>>ahead and do the whole thing like that.
>
>TestiClees, TestiClees. Shooting off your mouth bragging again, not to
>anyone's surprise. The best reason to not use Flash (or your generic
>rip-off version) to do sites is that it doesn't load on everyone's
>computer.
Flash is compatible with Windows, Linux and Mac. It works on Firefox,
IE, Opera, Netscape, Konqueror and Safari...so pretty much it loads on
anyone's computer actually, you fuckin MORON.
....of course, what the fuck would you know about it, yer no web
designer.
> It doesn't load on Web TV.
Actually WebTV does support Flash (although it can have problems with
larger Flash files)...not that I give a fuck about WebTV users, I
don't think those assholes should be on the net in the first place.
>It doesn't load on PDA or cell phone text browser.
...why the fuck would I want it to, you dribbling moron.
>You limit your audience by using only Flash.
....by excluding the WebTV, PDA and cell phone users? Woah, boy that's
gonna limit my audience by a whole... .00001%!
Boy, I better make all my sites text only, say to fuck to the 99.999%
majority just so I can cater to the five dribbling little asshole who
wish that the world revolved around them, huh? Wow, such stellar
logic, it could have only come from you Fly Poofter.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|