|
|
Posted by jake on 08/29/05 13:12
In message <j1d4h11v6mf0mcumf41l4vjhp27k30604k@4ax.com>, Andy Dingley
<dingbat@codesmiths.com> writes
>On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:40:35 +0100, jake <jake@gododdin.demon.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>Maybe it's just as well that it will work for the 90% of the Web
>>population using IE ;-)
>
>For an annoyingly small set of fonts too.
>
Interesting. Would you like to explain that one?
>I've never got anywhere with WEFT.
Hmmm. Can't really comment about your personal problems unless you want
to say what they were.
>As Jukka says, you can make a demo
>with it, but when you try to do any real work with it, you're into a
>hopeless mess.
A rather silly comment. As Jukka seems reluctant to gives specific
reasons for this 'hopeless mess', perhaps you would like to do so?
> For instance, has anyone made it work with a Mac?
No idea. What does the specification say?
>
>Only working for IE isn't a problem.
Glad to hear it.
>For the sort of pointy-haired
>web-clueless managers who demand this sort of font control, they
>probably think there's only one browser anyway.
9 out of 10 people can't be wrong ;-)
Think of font-embedding as just another weapon in the designer's
armoury.
You want to use it? It's there.
You don't want to use it? That's fine, too.
regards.
>
--
Jake
(jake@gododdin.demon.co.uk .... just a spam trap.)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|