|
|
Posted by Els on 08/29/05 17:54
Neredbojias wrote:
> With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>> With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
>>>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>>>> With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
>>>>>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What?? -A blinkin' shark? That's as bad as a bloomin' flower!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stop swearing!
>>>>>
>>>>> Geez, you sure are bossy. For your information, colorful language is
>>>>> part of the masculine mystique.
>>>>
>>>> That's what they say.
>>>> It's us women who let men believe all that crap.
>>>
>>> Oh, yeah, like men really believe women.
>>
>> They do.
>> It's not the woman's words they fall for, we know that. But we can
>> make you believe anything we want you to believe. Regardless of what
>> we seem to be saying to you.
>
> That's what some women may *think*, but is it really true? Ask yourself
> this question: Do men really believe anything?
Does the answer to that question have any value?
> Men are biological creatures.
Women aren't?
> Their primary imperative is to propagate.
That's not just men.
> Their beliefs are subordinate to and reliant upon their natural urges.
That's men.
> Women even admit this, to wit: "Men think with their ****s."
True.[1]
>>> For example, everyday I go
>>> through all of Barbara Zygote's posted pearls of wisdom just for the
>>> personal edification to be derived from perusing such picayunery.
>>>
>>> Guffaw, guffaw.
>>
>> You're so funny!
>
> That was irony,
Glad you noticed.
>>> I am a fair-minded individual and will listen to what a woman has to say
>>> - at least for a minute or so. If by then she hasn't made any sense,
>>> it's off to the bozo bin of balderdash
>>
>> With men, only 30 seconds are needed to distinguish between 'worth
>> listening to' and 'best smile and ignore'. To the men it makes no
>> difference though. They will just assume we decided on 'worth
>> listening to', as they can't tell the difference from our response.
>> Which by the way is not because there is no difference - other women
>> who are present will know - it's just that men fail to notice.
>
> I pretty much agree with you there. But so what? The whole point of
> talking to women in the first place is to see if they'll communicate on
> a more tactile level so one has to sort out the chaff from the whey
> somehow.
If men were better at communicating [2], they might find more women to
be whey than chaff.
> And, of course, there are always more squid in the sea.
That's good. I wouldn't like to think of myself as the only squid in
the sea.
>> Women have imposters? Wonder why...
>
> Oh, I think it's because some men are so confused by typical modern-day
> dogma that they just give up and decide to go fem. Perhaps they believe
> they will feel more satisfaction by becoming the plunkee,
If a woman is the plunkee, doesn't that make the man a plonker?
> but I doubt if
> it ever works. Women are in that position naturally and look at how
> much they bitch.
LOL!
--------
[1] To Mark, if you're reading: yes, there are exceptions ;-)
[2] Men don't have enough words to use, which makes them poor
communicators [1].
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|