|
Posted by David Dorward on 09/04/05 01:52
nAnd0 wrote:
>> "Back when HTML was first around" such coding would have been atrocious
>> too. There was a short period between 1996 and 2000 when it was
>> commonplace. (Still atrocious though.)
> You know what... The code is way to simplistic and short to be called
> atrocious.
The markup should look something like this:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>thedream.ca</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css">
</head>
<body>
<div id="splash"><div class="roundedCornerHack">
<h1>thedream.ca</h1>
<p class="note">under construction
<p>The image gallery is located at…<br>
<em><a
href="http://gallery.thedream.cs">http://gallery.thedream.cs</a></em>
</div></div>
</body>
</html>
Compared to that, your code is not in the least "simplistic" or "short". Its
bloated (not to mention the problems of syntax errors and nonsensical
semantic claims).
> . so do me a favour and stick your negative comments up your
> ass, your not helping anyone.
You're asking a group of people to invest their time and energy into helping
you for free. You are getting good (and free) advice from several different
people (Alan and Toby are respected experts on many of the topics this
newsgroup covers). The only person claiming that the advice isn't good is
you.
--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|