|
|
Posted by dorayme on 09/07/05 03:55
> From: Neredbojias <neredbojias@neredbojias.com>
> With neither quill nor qualm, dorayme quothed:
>
>>> From: Mark Parnell <webmaster@clarkecomputers.com.au>
>>
>>> Previously in alt.html, Khorne <khorne_fr1@hotmail.com> said:
>>>
>>>> I've got a problem with spacing/border between frames under Internet
>>>> Explorer.
>>>> Can somebody help me to fix this problem?
>>>
>>> Redesign the page without frames.
>>>
>>
>> ... and lose a possibly worthwhile facility. I think this latter
>> is fair enough comment given that we don't really know what the
>> OP is doing in detail... I know you hold fundamentalist views on
>> this issue... And that you would likely not so describe it...
>>
>> It is a scandal that browsers have not well supported some of
>> the features (like i-frames) that would at least make me hurry
>> to change my one remaining framed site. The feature of keeping
>> the navigation visible at all times. I no longer design with
>> frames but am constantly struck by the almost totally absurd
>> situation of navs scrolling out of site (yes, mine scroll away
>> like all the rest of us sheep).
>
> It isn't that hard to "seat" a nav section at the top of a page, and re:
> IE, you can even do it without javascript if you have some server-side
> support.
>
There is a lot of talk about the top of the page in frames
discussions. Frankly, I am not so keen to defend frames for this
but it is possible that a not very high top frame might be ok.
It is the side nav frame that can be useful and hard to match
without frames. Most monitors have more room in width and are
therefore more accommodating...
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|