|
Posted by dorayme on 12/25/74 11:26
> From: Jim Scott <mr.jimscott@Xvirgin.net>
>
>> dorayme
>
> Thanks you for your very thorough reply.
> Various bodies moan about frames so when I saw this:
> http://www.nvu.com/demos/frames/frameSimulate.html
> it got me to thinking. Not a thing that happens often.;o)
>
> I got 'so far' but could not get three panels in the arrangement I
> currently use. I cannot work out how to get the boxes side by side rather
> than one above the other.
I truly think you should reconsider a top panel like that just
for a home and next button. You have so much room in the content
panel, above and below the picture. Then it is so simple. You
have a left panel with the links, if you must have thumbnails -
against my advice :) - then style the left div to centre all
with devices like margin-left:auto, margin-right:auto and give a
padding for grace esp if you might put a nice right border (it
might be a bit severe all black and no border!). You float this
div "left" and your other div is just a straightforward exercise
in html and css: I would have an <h1>Title of pic</h1>, style
this to center by say margin-left:auto, margin-right:auto and a
width of a suitable em, a font-size you fancy - 140%? Then a div
(styled similarly but now you know the width in px because it is
your pic). Then a following div or p with a next and home link,
centred underneath. Should be a simple clean look.
> I understand your comment about the home button in a frame in its own, but
> if I move it to the main frame it becomes a positioning problem if the page
> is displayed on 800 x 600 which I'm sure happens a lot of the time. Then
> WHAT buttons do I have, 'home' and 'next' or 'home', 'next' and 'back' OR
> only 'home' and so enforce use of the thumbnails every time?
>
I can't see why you see a problem on a small screen, even the
tiniest? You centre such simple and few links and they will
always be there and centred. See above.
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|