|
|
Posted by Woodchuck Bill on 11/28/92 11:26
Fly Cooter <fly_cooter_@example.com> wrote in
news:1126481207.be5ef6318a257c6c12a3fed5db9d421a@bubbanews:
> In article <xn0e71oy11ttov000@kookology.info>, sean@petitmorte.net
> says...
>>
>>
>>PJR wrote:
>>
>>> On 09 Sep 2005 20:42:48 GMT, Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net>
>>> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>
>>> > PJR wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:02:55 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>> >> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>> > >
>>> >>> On 09 Sep 2005 16:39:58 GMT, "Sean Monaghan"
>>> >>> <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> >>>> This gay-lame/mutual-netKKKopping 'war' has a certain foul
>>> >>>> stench
>>> >> to it.
>>> > > >
>>> >>> ...*rechecks the thread*...
>>> > > >
>>> >>> Um, all of the AUK regs posting in response to Fly Poofter
>>> >>> are
>>> doing >>> exactly what I was doing with teh gay routine...so am
>>> I correct in >>> assuming that you mean to nominate the WHOLE of
>>> AUK? Or maybe you >>> need to bash yer fuckin head into the wall
>>> and rethink this one.
>>> > > >
>>> >>> Further...what do you mean "mutual" netkopping? I never
>>> >>> netkopped anything. I threatened to blow his lil Tripod
>>> >>> smear off the face
>>> of >>> the Inet, however that isn't netkopping, that's just
>>> being an uber >>> evul fuckhead bastage. Netkopping is where
>>> you try and have
>>> >>> something taken down, removed, silences, etc out of
>>> >>> "genuine" reasons, not because you're doing it as a means of
>>> >>> attacking a person. For example if Fly Poofter was trying
>>> >>> to get the image taken down in order to "get back" at me,
>>> >>> rather than doing it because he's on some righteous
>>> >>> copyright infringement crusade. However retarded that
>>> >>> endeavor is, it is a "genuine" reason.
>>> > >
>>> >> Your whining about your netkkkopping threats not really being
>>> >> netkkkopping threats, because you'd enjoy being a netkkkop,
>>> >> constitutes the lamest thing you've posted since your last
>>> hilariously >> broken web page, Diapertard.
>>> > >
>>> >>>> I hereby nominate Onideus Mad Hatter and Fly Cooter,
>>> >>>> jointly, for
>>> >> the >> Busted Urinal Award.
>>> > > >
>>> >>> I already have that one,
>>> > >
>>> >> Indeed you do, and quite a few others.
>>> > >
>>> >> Search Results
>>> >> 6 matches for "moulton".
>>> > >
>>> >> Kook of the Month, December 2004 Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>>> >> Golden Killfile, December 2004 Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>>> >> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, December 2004
>>> >> Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>>> >> Busted Urinal Award Matthew "Diaperboy" Moulton
>>> >> Unabomber Surprise Matthew "Diaperboy" Moulton
>>> >> Kook Kard Deck, Four of Clubs Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>>> > >
>>> >>> Stupid...like 3 or 4 times now I think,
>>> >
>>> >> You can't win it more than once, Mathilda.
>>> >
>>> > I actually nominated the lame-war between Matthew and Flyboi.
>>>
>>> I noticed. I was commenting on Diaperboi's claim to have won the
>>> award three or four times.
>>>
>>> I can't really comment on the nomination of the lame-war between
>>> him and Fly Cooter, since I haven't bothered to read any of
>>> their lames yet. However, I'm not keen on allowing Mr
>>> Blank-Web-Page a second BUA, even if it's a joint one. He's not
>>> an interesting enough kook.
>>>
>>> > If you
>>> > can't accept this nom, are there any other suitable awards for
>>> > this pair? PAP, or Pickett, perhaps?
>>>
>>> PAP is open to anybody, and there are hardly any qualifications
>>> other than being pathetic enough to be noticed in AUK. The
>>> Pickett is more difficult to decide about. It has to involve an
>>> element of failed crusading, and I can't see Diaperboi crusading
>>> at present.
>>
>>Good info - thanks.
>>
>>I hereby request a nomination morph, from the Busted Urinal Award,
>>to the Pathetic Anal Pineapple Award, for Onideus Mad Hatter & Fly
>>Cooter, jointly.
>>
>>Seconds, anyone?
>
> I'd say give the award to TestiClees alone but he might be
> incarcerated soon. Why waste an award on someone who can't accept
> it. And please just leave me out of anything connected with his
> name. I don't want anything to do with this fucking homo erectus.
> But thanks anyhow.
Nobody cares what _you_ think about the nomination. Deal with it, kook.
You can keep track of your nomination status here...
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/nominations.html
--
Bill
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|