|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 09/13/05 14:56
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:39:09 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:09:25 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter
><usenet@bilgewater-productions.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:38:32 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:07:10 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter
>>><usenet@bilgewater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:55:37 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:50:22 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:03:13 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:16:54 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:21:50 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:23:58 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:07:03 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:01:03 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 21:42:37 GMT, bryan
>>>>>>>>>>>> <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:19:51 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>still using that malformed sig that only works with agent, no0b?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh so it works with Agent now, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>er... i was mocking your claim that it only works with agent,
>>>>>>>>>>>matthew... will it help if i put that in quotation marks?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>ahem. still using that malformed sig that "only works with agent",
>>>>>>>>>>>no0b?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Uh oh, backpedal, LOOK OUT!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>yeah! watch out, matthew... you nearly fell off!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>now. back to the matter at hand.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>here is _your_ statement - "It's formated perfectly...for Agent users"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>do you still contend that your malformed sig works with forte agent?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now that I got you to agree with it...of course. The goal was to get
>>>>>>>> you to believe that it actually worked in Agent but didn't work in Free
>>>>>>>> Agent...the goal was met, you believed it and thus at that point I
>>>>>>>> pointed out that it does in fact NOT work in Agent. You were trolled.
>>>>>>>> ^_^
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>translation:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>i was wrong and i've made up a story in a lame attempt to claw back some
>>>>>>>dignity... it didn't work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...of course, one has to wonder...does it REALLY not work like I
>>>>>>>> originally said in Agent? He, he, he, he...oh I could fuck your lil
>>>>>>>> head up for weeks on end, boy lemme tell ya. `, )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>it won't work with any newsreader.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So now you're saying it won't work in ANY news reader, huh?
>>>>>
>>>>>yup.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you REALLY sure?
>>>>>
>>>>>yup.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell us that you're absolutely positive, Kiddo.
>>>>>
>>>>>yup.
>>>>
>>>>Well...I hate to be the one to break it to ya, but I lied again!
>>>>^_^
>>>>
>>>>LOL, oh I never tire of this game.
>>>>
>>>>The deciding factor is not Agent nor Free Agent, but in fact the
>>>>version numbers. Old versions of Agent and Free Agent (anything
>>>>before 2.0) and the .sig will be removed perfectly.
>>>
>>>i don't believe you.
>>>
>>>> Would you like to deny it?
>>>
>>>yes.
>>>
>>>>Go on, you know you want to.
>>>
>>>i just did.
>>>
>>>>Openly defy me right now,
>>>
>>>ok.
>>>
>>>>make the claim once again,
>>>
>>>rightio.
>>>
>>>>tell everyone that it doesn't work right in ANY
>>>>version of Agent.
>>>
>>>ahem... you're malformed .sig will not work in _any_ version of forte
>>>agent, even those below version 2.0.
>>
>>WRONG!
>
><SLAP>
>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/uk.telecom/msg/a8ff8d0bcc1f8cfe
>>
>>"Agent has handled OE "malformed" .sig separators for some time"
>
>scrape that barrel, matthew!
>
>irrelevant. the malformed .sig from outlook has nothing to do with
>your .sig... 5 out of 10 for failed diversion.
>
>a proper .sig seperator is -- (hyphen, hyphen, space).
>
>outlook strips the space from the .sig seperator such that when people
>reply to outlook users posts, the .sig isn't stripped.
>
>_your_ malformed .sig is -- (space, hyphen, hyphen) and it will not
>work in _any_ newsreader, including agent or free agent of any
>version.
Post proof, Bryan...or are you just pulling shit out of your ass? I
posted proof...why can't you? ^_^
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|