|
Posted by GamblerZG on 10/25/05 01:16
Oliver Grätz wrote:
> GamblerZG schrieb:
>
>>>But what benefit is there is having it as an explicitly "abstract"
>>>class? Why can't it just be a "normal" class definition which you
>>>inherit from?
>>
>>The idea is that a high-level language should prohobit you from doing
>>things that do not make sence. Why they implemented it in PHP? Because
>>it's there in Java, I guess.
>
>
> No, it's there because it makes sense.
I did not say abstractness did not make sense. But it's not crucial.
--
Best regards,
Roman S.I.
http://sf.net/projects/naturalgine/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|