|
|
Posted by Ol!v!ι on 12/05/05 11:33
NickName wrote:
> Probably this question has been asked hundreds of times and yet net
> search has not generated satisfactory enough answer, at least, to me.
> And OK, let's assume your organization has more than 200 employees,
> just one measure to indicate that it's not small and data processing
> needs are quite extensive (for both OLTP and OLAP).
>
> We've heard so much about concurrency support, stability and
> performance. Are there any real persuasive paper out there to talk
> about it? Now, let me also put it in another perspective, say, you're
> a Microsoft sql server sales guy or gal for that matter for new
> accounts. What you got?
>
> Thanks.
>
One good reason is that using SQL Server is that the network load is
much less than compared to using linked tables.
I've executed the following query from the VBA-Direct window:
UPDATE table SET column = 'value'
table contained approx. 7000 records. The packet count for executing
this with SQL Server was exactly 9. When using MS Access as a backend,
the packet count was more than 65000.
Also, I believe that Access can only work with 25 connections at most,
while SQL Server can have virtually unlimited connections. Please
correct me when I'm wrong.
When using the database locally (i.e. not over a network), upgrading to
SQL Server would be extra overhead imho.
OliviΓ©
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|