|
|
Posted by Els on 09/06/05 14:52
Neredbojias wrote:
[ex-wife]
>>> She also
>>> seemed to lack a certain sense of decorum that most people exhibit
>>> relative to whatever social setting they happen to be in at the moment.
>>
>> Erm.. you mean she'd burp in an exclusive restaurant or wear high
>> heels on a bike ride or something?
>
> Yeah, that's it. No couth and no class. Unfortunately, no character,
> either.
So... what made you fall for her then?!
Temporary brain-loss?
>>> One thing I found pretty funny was that a couple of times she said,
>>> "Well, at least we're compatible on an intellectual level." Well, we're
>>> not. She had more ego than brains, although I probably should have
>>> taken a different tact with her tantrums than I did as well.
>>
>> More ego than brains.. you're sure she was a woman?
>> </ducks>
>
> The Devil Woman from Hell. Perhaps I did something really, really bad
> in a past life.
Doesn't have to be a past life.
The really really bad thing you did could easily have been a simple
thing like choosing the wrong woman.
>>>>>> Btw, it's men who have a lack of blood in their brain cells when they
>>>>>> use what they do have. Recipe for discombobulation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not exactly. Men are proficient at redistributing bodily fluids for
>>>>> their vital purposes and can always take a nap after mating if they feel
>>>>> fatigued.
>>>>
>>>> May I assume then that thinking straight is not a vital purpose?
>>>
>>> Phffft. Who can think straight when he's got a boner?
>>
>> Erm.. that's what I meant by saying the blood is required elsewhere so
>> the brain can't use it, thus leaving men discombobulated more easily
>> then women :-)
>
> Oh, men aren't discombobulated under such circumstances. They simply
> osmose into an altered state where as often as not they are able to be
> even more single-minded due to the damping of extraneous stimuli.
Boils down to the same thing imo.
> Furthermore, men have brain-power to spare so a few red cells more or
> less probably don't mean as much in the cranium as they do in the
> crotch.
You might have a point there.
> I'm definitely not a Brazilian. I don't even like their nuts.
Knew that.
> ...
>>> And speaking of your response to
>>> the non-response issue, it's easy enough for a woman to "force a
>>> response", indeed. All she has to do is dance around in something
>>> skimpy, gyrate her genomes a little, and Bingo! She scores! Men,
>>> because of their biological makeup, can be overwhelmed by the tactics of
>>> most any wily, wicked woman displaying such a concupiscent bent,
>>> although they do feel a certain sense of remorse when they've been
>>> drinking and sober up.
>>
>> That's not exactly what I meant by forcing. That is foul play if you
>> ask me.
>
> Exactly. But it's far from a rarity and many women consider it normal
> behavior.
Glad I'm not a man having to put up with that :-)
>>> And last but not least, ask yourself this question: What would the
>>> world say if a man tried to "force a response"?
>>
>> If you'd use the same force I meant, there would be no problem.
>> When you really need an answer, and the partner doesn't wanna give a
>> response, tell 'em the consequences. Which should not be any physical
>> harm inflicted as punishment, but a logical consequence of that lack
>> of a response.
>
> Just as a side note, there is never a legitimate excuse for abusing a
> woman (-or a gay person or a nerd or even an Australian.) However, when
> you said "force", I took it to mean force not merely steadfastness.
Steadfastness can be used as a powerful force.
They say that you can even use it to raise little rascals to be
responsible adults! Ask me in about 15 years if it really works.
>> A bit like women who want their man to say if he loves them. Man
>> doesn't know for sure, so he doesn't wanna say it. Woman says she has
>> to know very soon, or else there's the consequence: man loses woman.
>> Very simple. Very effective (if followed through).
>
> Oh, the humanities! I think I need a beer.
Sorry.
>> "Jockstraps were first developed in the late 1800's to be worn by
>> bicycle delivery boys by the Bike Company."
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jockstrap
>
> So for the entire existence of the human race minus a little over 100
> years, men had no support.
I guess no man has been inspired enough by that to invent such a
simple thing as a jock-strap then.
> No wonder I'm cranky in the morning.
Blame it on the inventors. (not the one that finally did invent the
thing - all the other ones from way back)
>> See? No use. I probably gave up on acting at the age of one. That's
>> when I stopped pretending I could whistle (not a tune, one tone it
>> was).
>
> It's a good thing, though. Women are supposed to be the whistlees not
> the whistlers.
You reckon that's what made me decide to stop at age one?
>>>> No need to spell it out for me, I got the joke the first time.
>>>
>>> Well, excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuusssssse me! Most
>>> gals find a bit of repetition invigorating.
>>
>> Not when it comes to jokes - I think you've been had :-)
>
> -Many times. And admittedly, some of them were jokes.
:-)
>> [chat-up lines]
>> So.. what wheel do you spin to chat up a prospective partner?
>
> Well, if she's a dummy, I usually start out with "I like a girl with
> brains." If I think she can reason deductively, I mention that I wear
> extra large underpants. And last but least, the smart ones are told I'm
> a doctor and asked if they've ever experienced the discomfort of a cold,
> cold stethoscope in warmest of places. That one's almost fail safe.
If she falls for that, she's not that smart.
Or maybe she is. Depends on what she's after, I guess.
Btw, how do you detect which category the girl is in before you start
talking?
>>>> And then you wonder why it doesn't work?
>>>> If a man in a bar asks you why he never saw you there before, it
>>>> simply implies that a) the man hangs out there virtually every day (or
>>>> weekend), and b) so far didn't have success finding a mate. This
>>>> proves that a) he's only after a one-night-stand, or b) there's
>>>> something wrong with him, so basically, you don't want him either.
>>>
>>> Yes, but if a woman in a bar asks the same question, it means a) she's a
>>> gold-digging floozy out for bucks and willing to work "undercover" to
>>> get them, or b) she contracted a case of syphilis, is going blind, and
>>> desperately needs glasses and one for the road.
>>
>> Indeed. All reasons to avoid that type of woman.
>
> -And the intrepidly unavoidable reason not to.
I figured you'd say something to that extent. <g>
> -At least so it's generally generalized in the genuine journals of
> geriatric generals.
What noise annoys an oyster most?
>>>>>>> <Misc. irreproachable truisms by Neredbojias snipped>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I find that hard to believe, really.
>>>>
>>>> Nice snippage :-)
>>>
>>> I am oft complimented for my snippage,
>>> Though more oft rebuked for my sippage.
>>> I do not pass gas nor crassly burp,
>>> But, alas, I've been known to loudly slurp.
>>
>> Not only good with prose, but a poet as well!
>
> -From way back. I've penned o'er a hundred bodacious odes and wrote
> some more in pencil.
Didn't they deserve ink?
> And to wit, some rather notably famous personage from a bygone era
Sounds like you're really really old. 94?
> actually purloined some of my best scribblage thereby
> committing the unspeakable act of plagiarism, but he shall be nameless
> here forevermore.
And what has this person done for you that you grant him such mercy?
>>> Hmm, I thought you were an Aussie. Can't remember why, -perhaps your
>>> argumentative nature.
>>
>> As far as I know, Aussies are generally friendly, outgoing, lively and
>> irrepressibly optimistic. Is that what you call argumentative?
>
> No, it's what I call a loaded question. Do you know any Australians
> besides kangaroos and koala bears?
Yes. Remember Mark Parnell, rf, brucie and Disco Octopus? (probably
forgot a few)
I do know a few in real life too though, but haven't spoken to them
for about 10 years now. They all have this weird habit of living in a
far away country.
>> Anyway, no, I'm not Australian, I'm Dutch. That means not Danish, nor
>> German. It's the nationality of the inhabitants of the Netherlands.
>> Western Europe :-)
>
> I'm an earthling. Not Martian, not Venusian, and definitely not
> Centaurian.
I guess that's a Good Thing.
> Certain, uh, creatures call me a wild space jock but I
> prefer to think of myself as a geodesic node nestled comfortably on the
> back side of an imposing butte.
Sure, why not :-)
>>> And, of course, men are supposed to be the omniscient mind-readers who
>>> *know* when a woman is speaking plainly and when a woman is speaking
>>> fainly. Yeah...
>>
>> You got that right. (well, almost - 'fainly' is spelled wrong)
>> It's not like we make it difficult for you to detect the difference
>> though. As soon as you make an error, you are corrected. If the error
>> is in favour of salaciousness, the correction usually is served as a
>> slap. If the error is in the opposite direction, the consequence is
>> less sex than you could have had.
>
> Oh pshaw! That's female-thinking of the most chauvinistic kind.
> 'Thought it went out with the bustle and corset.
Is that how long you haven't had contact with a female?
>>>>>> [1] That sure is a funny word, especially when you say it a couple of
>>>>>> times in a row.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's what I thought about "do".
>>>>
>>>> I agree. I've so far only found one example where repeating the word
>>>> 'do' doesn't sound too funny. Maybe 'cause they put some music behind
>>>> it and combined it with 'da'.
>>>
>>> Well, I hope the Camptown ladies sing other songs as well because that
>>> one fell off the charts a mighty long time ago.
>>
>> Didn't know that song. Now I have two examples :-)
>
> Er, what other song has "do da" in it?
None, but I was talking of a combination of 'da' with repeated 'do's
;-)
<quote>
Don't think me unkind
Words are hard to find
They're only cheques I've left unsigned
From the banks of chaos in my mind
And when their eloquence escapes me
Their logic ties me up and rapes me
Poets priests and politicians
Have words to thank for their positions
Words that scream for your submission
And no-one's jamming their transmission
'Cos when their eloquence escapes you
Their logic ties you up and rapes you
</quote>
The 'do' and the 'da' are in the chorus:
<quote>
De do do do de da da da
Is all I want to say to you
De do do do de da da da
Their innocence will pull me through
De do do do de da da da
Is all I want to say to you
De do do do de da da da
They're meaningless and all that's true
</quote>
Just in case it doesn't ring a bell, it's 'De Do Do Do' by The Police
(1980).
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|