|
|
Posted by TJ on 12/25/65 11:26
In news:opswwjjmi0x5vgts@zoete_b,
Barbara de Zoete <b_de_zoete@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:26:30 +0100, Toby Inkster
> <usenet200509@tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Barbara de Zoete wrote:
>>
>>> Does Google have the authors permission?
>>> [to archive posts]
>>
>> Google creates a copy of your post on their server;
>
> If it stops there, fine. But it then uses the copy in some fancy but
> buggy interface it calls Google Groups and encourages people to
> become 'member' to participate in them. That part is quite different.
> I am just not sure I like anyone using my posts for something
> interactive like that.
I don't understand the last part of the paragraph above. If you don't want
interaction, why post publically at all?
If it's just newsgroup interaction with incoming posts from Google Groups
that annoy you, there are many easily implemented ways around that.
> Archive, searchable, the like. Great. Reuse
> them for another purpose and you're slipping and sliding somewhere
> not necessarily good.
I still don't think I understand. Are you saying you don't mind if your
posts get archived, so long as nobody can respond to them? Or just that
nobody who sees them via Google Groups need reply?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|