|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 10/03/46 11:26
With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
> >> Ow?
> >
> > Ow?? Did I step on your toe or are you just prone to spontaneous
> > cries of pain?
>
> No, that would be 'ouch!' 'Ow?' may be the Dutch equivalent of 'Oh?
> How so?'
Ow, really? (I was going to ask you to teach me Dutch, but I think this
is all I can stand.)
> >> How to explain this to the male
> >> species... It's not the showing, but the showing off, making
> >> absolutely sure we pay attention to it, even if we've just seen it
> >> enough already.
> >
> > Okay, I see. A wise man knows when to stop with the visual aids
> > and get on with the action.
>
> Visual aids.. is that what you call it <g>
Actually, it has an old Indian name: "Heep Big Snake That Point At Sky
When Wigwam Shake." (The bedubbing originated from a loquacious
Iroquois known for her sagacious quotations.)
> >> Basically like a little boy that's proud of a new accomplishment.
> >> Only little boys are cute when they do that.
> >
> > Well, I may demur but many priests agree with you wholeheartedly.
>
> That's not what I meant. I said 'little boy being proud of a new
> accomplishment.' Like "Mom! Did you see me throw that frisbee? It
> went all the way to the neighbour's garden!" or "Look what I just
> wrote here - we learned to write the M today!"
Well I tried that when I learned how to take a leak no-handed and got
nothing but negativity.
>
> > Women say they reach maturity before men do but when I was in that
> > age-bracket not one of them would show me the hair to prove it.
>
> The fact that you did not understand that, proves those women were
> mature when you still weren't.
>
> >> Jack Daniels doesn't bite.
> >> Well, never bit me - tastes great with Coke.
> >
> > Oh, yuck-o! I can see you're not a purist, JD should never be
> > mixed and attains its finest flavor when tipped straight from the
> > bottle.
>
> I'm not a purist no - sometimes I'll drink stuff mixed, sometimes
> neat.
Sometimes I drink stuff neat and sometimes I drink stuff sloppy. -Yet
another difference in the sexes.
>
> >>> The only Australians I've met personally were in a zoo between the
> >>> Gooney Birds and the sewer rats.
> >>
> >> I've seen those too - not nearly as friendly as the human Aussies.
> >
> > Perhaps the ones you met were high on eucalyptus extract.
>
> Are you talking about the animals or the humans?
Er, how can you tell the difference?
>
> >>> "Happily married" is a state achieved only by the delusional.
> >>
> >> As long as they're happy, who cares about delusional.
> >
> > So say the drug mongers in the ghetto.
>
> True. I think I should have expressed myself differently:
> Who is to say who is delusional and who isn't?
We must all decide for ourselves. Unfortunately, if you add up all the
votes, there are more delusional people in the world than there are
people in the world. Now tell me *that* isn't delusional.
>
> > Marriage is the opiate of the
> > masses but some will swallow anything for a little sex.
>
> You obviously married the wrong person, but you knew that already.
> It's not marriage that's to blame for that though.
My statement wasn't meant to be a condemnation of the institution of
marriage per se but a recommendation for singles to "think before you
link". Too many youthful yokels nowadays don't realize that marriage is
more than a last-ditch effort to get into someone's pants. It is also a
responsibility that includes the concession of certain freedoms which
one may no longer enjoy except in a clandestine manner with the onus of
having an antagonist always around looking over your shoulder for
possible evidence of actual enjoyment or peace-of-mind outside the
sphere of her personal authority. If this isn't the life you were
expecting with your teaty-sweety, hah hah! -Are you in for a big
surprise!
-Er, got lost there in my thoughts for a moment. Yeah, marriage is okay
for the right kinds of persons. -Slaves and masochists.
>
> >>> although I suppose some bachelors could
> >>> put up quite a stink if they ran out of Jergens lotion.
> >>
> >> Plain soap may help in such unfortunate cases.
> >
> > To be honest, I'd say the mixture of men and plain soap is much
> > less viable than a mixture of women and soft soap.
>
> I think you're right. Put a soft soap and a plain soap in the bath
> room, and any man will pick the soft soap. So, if both men and women
> use the soft soap - who is ever gonna buy the plain soap?
That isn't a question I have asked myself recently, but I will
contemplate it and get back to you.
> >>>>> http://www.neredbojias.com/_uimages/bll2c.m3u
> >>>
> >>> And yes, there is a gothic flavor to it, but it still somehow
> >>> reminds me of Debbie Boone's "You Light Up My Life". (Um, I
> >>> guess this could be due to the oblique reference to strippers.)
> >>
> >> That must be it. No way that song could make me sleep.
> >
> > Well I hope you don't think that *I* would drift off in the
> > presence of a woman who was taking off her clothes!
>
> How do you hear 'taking off her clothes' in that Debbie Boone song?
>
> >>> Odes are my life, and I'm the most odious guy I know.
> >>
> >> Except for the odd odious ode maybe, I don't think you really have
> >> much odium in you.
> >
> > Then what do you think I am, the hollow, empty shell of a man who
> > has turned to the Internet in a vain effort to capture the meaning
> > of life, the universe, and everything?
>
> That thought hadn't crossed my mind yet, but it is of course an
> option.
Yeah, an option for nuts. Just because a person has something doesn't
mean he is it.
>
> > Let me say this about that: it's not for nudie pictures alone that I
> > sail the cybernetic seaway! While I have momentarily forgotten the
> > other reasons, you can bet your bottom bippie that "Neredbojias"
> > does not mean "flesh pot seeker". (At least in English.)
>
> What does it mean really?
Really? Nothing. It's just a name like "Tom" or "Bruce" or
"Subhranyamen Chandrasikar". Oh, there was a "neritboias ixtl" or
something like that mentioned in paleo-Incan scrawlings discovered
inside a cave near Chichen Itza, but I think it was simply their pet
name for the outhouse.
>
> > PS: When someone posted a stream for someone else's edification, one
> > would have figured that someone else would have noticed the 32 kbps
> > bitstream
>
> Oops, no - didn't notice. It just streamed, didn't look at the
> details.
-Much like I during bladder release.
>
> > and realized that someone was not an American capitalistic pig with,
>
> Didn't think you were really...
>
> > among other things, a hi-speed Internet connection.
>
> You haven't? Okay, I now know that :-)
>
> > However, perhaps someone (-the original) was somewhat
> > over-optimistic relative to someone else's (-the other)
> > noticeability factor.
>
> Definitely.
>
> > In any event, I managed to accomplish the mission despite these
> > egregious circumstances
>
> Hurray!
>
> > by using a little good ol' male ingenuity.
>
> You're sure it's male? I reckon I used the same to get the file
> downloaded to keep instead of hearing it only once :P
Really? I'm impressed. And here I thought you were only a pretty type-
face.
PS: If you want the hi-fi version (128 kbps), let me know.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|