|
|
Posted by bryan on 12/25/93 11:26
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:16:54 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:21:50 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:23:58 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:07:03 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:01:03 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 21:42:37 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:19:51 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>still using that malformed sig that only works with agent, no0b?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh so it works with Agent now, eh?
>>>>
>>>>er... i was mocking your claim that it only works with agent,
>>>>matthew... will it help if i put that in quotation marks?
>>>>
>>>>ahem. still using that malformed sig that "only works with agent",
>>>>no0b?
>>>
>>> Uh oh, backpedal, LOOK OUT!
>>
>>yeah! watch out, matthew... you nearly fell off!
>>
>>now. back to the matter at hand.
>>
>>here is _your_ statement - "It's formated perfectly...for Agent users"
>>
>>do you still contend that your malformed sig works with forte agent?
>
> Now that I got you to agree with it...of course. The goal was to get you
> to believe that it actually worked in Agent but didn't work in Free
> Agent...the goal was met, you believed it and thus at that point I pointed
> out that it does in fact NOT work in Agent. You were trolled. ^_^
translation:
i was wrong and i've made up a story in a lame attempt to claw back some
dignity... it didn't work.
>
>
> ...
>
>
>
> ...of course, one has to wonder...does it REALLY not work like I
> originally said in Agent? He, he, he, he...oh I could fuck your lil head
> up for weeks on end, boy lemme tell ya. `, )
it won't work with any newsreader.
> -- <-- malformed sig
>
> Odious Mud Splatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.bilgewater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|