|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 09/13/05 12:12
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:19:31 GMT, Solbarth <solbarth@wack-job.net>
wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:37:29 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter escaped from the
>straightjacket long enough to type:
>
>> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:02:24 -0400, Missing Person <lick@myballs.cum>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:29:33 -0700 Onideus Mad Hatter
>>><usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in Message id:
>>><7jk3i1d0vsnb5utqkaffcgc5fc1nla56en@4ax.com>:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:17:27 -0400, Missing Person <lick@myballs.cum>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:50:28 -0700 Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>>><usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in Message id:
>>>>><s9e3i1pgdrpatvj8utogprt57it8tgjrlm@4ax.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 9 Sep 2005 16:30:23 GMT, "subRoutinè@s!0.0^7ii"
>>>>>><s007ii@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>
>>>>>*sigh*
>>>>>
>>>>>I almost miss Lionel.
>>>>>
>>>>>Almost.
>>>>
>>>>Miss Lionel was never really very good though. She had decent staying
>>>>power...for awhile. But she wound up burning out completely and then
>>>>effectively went net.dead. Kind of disappointing really, not very
>>>>resilient at all. Miss Lionel was also the original dumbass, the one
>>>>who I lured in so easily. The really sad part too is that at the time
>>>>it was before Hipcrime damaged so many of my threads in that community
>>>>(the ones involved in disputes, arguments, flame wars, etc). I mean,
>>>>they were EASY to find in Deja at the time. A simple search on "Baby
>>>>Matthew" back then would bring up an unending string of hate posts from
>>>>that community. Lionel was so entirely fucking stupid he didn't even
>>>>bother to properly research his target and inadvertently wound up
>>>>fucking his entire froup over. One could even say that if it wasn't for
>>>>Lionel's stupidity I never would have been able to start that war
>>>>between AUK and AHM. Thanks Lionel! ^_^
>>>
>>>QED.
>>
>> What do quantum electrodynamics have to do with it?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter
>> mhm ¹ x ¹
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net
>
>perhaps he meant QED as in "quod erat demonstrandum"
....well then I'm confused, was he attempting to be sarcastic or does
he just not comprehend the translation? I find it odd that he would
agree...well, assuming he's a volatile froup reg...to be perfectly
honest I stopped keeping track a couple years ago. *shrugs*
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|