|
|
Posted by Peter Parsnip on 12/18/41 11:28
Be still! and revere ah, who blessed us with their presence on 06 Oct
2005...
> Peter Parsnip wrote:
>> Be still! and revere Flaagg, who blessed us with their presence on 05
>> Oct 2005...
>>
>>> In article <8OE0f.309$Ll2.243@trnddc04>, ah <splifingate@gmail.com>
>>> writes...
>>>
>>>>Peter Parsnip wrote:
>>>>> Be still! and revere mimus, who blessed us with their presence on
>>>>> 04 Oct 2005...
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 07:21:07 +0000 (UTC), Peter Parsnip wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Spanky The Thunder Chicken, who blessed us
>>>>>>> with their presence on 04 Oct 2005...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "PURPLE!" screamed Peter Parsnip, who then launched into a
>>>>>>>> lengthy diatribe, which was named
>>>>>>>> "news:dhotb7$evu$9@pookiehead.databasix.com":
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Flonk *must* be destroyed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Flonk *has* been destroyed. Dozens of times. Nuked to
>>>>>>>> oblivion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We're just the cockroaches that are left.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lies! All lies! You know that this time demon.local is going to
>>>>>>> win. You are just lowering expectations so that when we
>>>>>>> eventually do annex your froup, it will not seem like a big
>>>>>>> defeat.
>>>
>>> demon.local has only three subscribers, it seems. Not much of an
>>> invasion force.
>>
>> Cease these scandalous lies, Troll!
>
> Who is this bad man, Peter?
I don't know, but it is clear he is from alt.penthouse.sex.ugly.
>>>>>>> I repeat:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Flonk *must* be destroyed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Flonk *must* be destroyed
>>>>>
>>>>> The Flonk *must* be destroyed
>>>>
>>>>The Flonk *must* be destroyed
>>>
>>> The Flonk *has been* destroyed
>>
>> The Flonk *has been* destroyed
>
> The Flonk *has been* destroyed
The Flonk *has been* destroyed
--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|